Republican legislators, using the rhetoric of
“accountability,” are aiming for the jugular of public education. A fast-track
bill now before the Wisconsin Senate calls for the wholesale privatization of
public schools in the state, in particular Milwaukee.
The bill’s consequences are obfuscated by bureaucratic
double-speak, arcane details and complicated loopholes. Fundamentally, however,
the bill is a frontal attack on public schools, on democracy, and on poor
children. It undermines the Wisconsin constitution’s guarantee of a free and
public education to all children.
Under the bill, “failing” public schools will be forced to
close or be handed over to privately run charters — whether or not a locally
elected school board thinks this is a good idea, and whether or not the school
board has a community-based improvement plan.
Under the guise of “accountability,” the bill is a blueprint
for turning over public schools to privately run charters, in particular
national McFranchise charter chains.
Under the guise of “accountability,” the bill demands failure. It requires that at least 5 percent of the schools get a grade of
“F” every year — no matter how the school is actually performing.
Under the guise of “accountability,” the bill sets up
schools as failures and then uses this failure to promote privatization.
Devil is in the Details
The bill transforms the current state report card system
into A-F letter grades. The bill states that any school that receives “a grade of F for three consecutive
school years, or has received a grade of F in three of five consecutive school
years and a grade no higher than D in the other two school years” will be
subjected to sanctions.
These provisions apply to all publicly funded schools
through Wisconsin — traditional public schools, privately run charters, and
private voucher schools. But there’s a catch. Consequences for public schools
are more drastic, particularly the Milwaukee Public Schools.
“F” and “D” grades will be counted against MPS this school year.
Failing grades will not be counted against non-MPS schools for another two
years.
As is well documented, there is a correlation between
poverty and the legislature’s definition of “low performing.” The bill’s impact
will be felt most by MPS, where 81 percent of the students qualify for free and
reduced lunch.
The Republican-dominated legislature is known for its
antipathy toward Milwaukee, the state’s largest and most important city. But
Milwaukee also happens to vote Democratic and is home to a disproportionate
number of poor people and people of color.
Not surprisingly the bill could spell the death knell for
the Milwaukee Public Schools, already reeling from decades of privatization via
vouchers and privately run charters overseen by the City of Milwaukee and the
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
Weak Sanctions for
Charters
The bill sets up dual standards for traditional public
schools and privately run charters. For instance, a privately run charter’s
first five years won’t count when it comes to determining possible sanctions. Second,
grades for privately run charters (almost all of which are in Milwaukee) will
not be counted for another two years. As I noted above, grades for MPS schools will
be taken into account beginning this school year.
Weakest Provisions
for Vouchers
As for the bill’s alleged concern with “accountability,” the
most blatant hypocrisy involves private voucher schools. Failing voucher
schools will not be required to close, but merely prevented from enrolling
additional students.
To cite another glaring problem: the bill does not require
voucher schools to adhere to the state’s open meetings and records laws. Nor
does the bill call upon voucher schools to respect basic constitutional rights
of due process or free speech, or adhere to state anti-discrimination measures
in the areas of sexual orientation, marital status or pregnancy.
But here’s the bill’s most blatant hypocritical move.
Voucher schools will not be required to take the same achievement tests as
other publicly funded schools. Instead, they will be allowed to use a “nationally
recognized, norm-referenced” test, thus making it difficult to compare
achievement between public schools and voucher schools. Call me suspicious, but
is this because the voucher school students have performed worse than MPS students
on the Wisconsin achievement tests?
Direct Target: MPS
The bill’s authors have done nothing to hide their
preference for voucher and privately run charter schools, a preference that
harms public schools across the state. But there is one final kick specifically
aimed at MPS.
Across the state, the school boards will be forced to turn
schools over to privately run charter organizations, but at least they will
have the fig leaf of a voice and must approve the contract. In Milwaukee, the
superintendent can act on his own.
It’s unclear how the bill will play across the state. But
stay tuned. Rumors are that the bill is being re-crafted so that it is “less
favorable” to the Milwaukee Public Schools.
Thanks so much Bob for writing an understandable position on what's happening in Madison. I personally think its time for union leadership to find effective ways to eliminate and crush legislation such as this. Act 10 was a preview of what is going to continue happening to education and strategies must be implemented now to stop further devastation.
ReplyDeleteFor future reference, Bob, can you avoid the relic, political verbiage you use in your blogs. While it goes on to prove intellect, it does little for us teachers and the public at large, including parents, in trying to decipher what exactly your point is.
ReplyDeleteI see nothing about the language of this post that is hard to decipher. It seems very clear to me. I guess you could use "hidden" instead of "obfuscate" and there are a few other examples like that, but none of the words are beyond the normal vocabulary of any high schooler, in my opinion.
DeleteSo can I assume that this is one of the ways Gov. Walker will use to lower property taxes throughout Wisconsin?
ReplyDeleteMy son teaches in MPS and sent me this. After reading the most recent blog I see why he is so distraught. If the bill passes, I recommend all this be taken to the courts for redress as soon as possible, and to the Supreme Court if necessary
ReplyDelete